It gives the idea you wrote it on your blog or in one of the forums but definitely your words were abused It's a very badly written article He's more fit for the columns on the Observer, politics is not his bread
Sarah
· 3 months ago
I just read the article. What the hell is he on about? Apart from the fact that I now know your story, some information is blatantly wrong. The Cabinet decision was not to "stop" the morning radio program as he claims. It just contained rules regulating the program, which went on to air for another season after the decision was made. Saleh Al Shaibany has lost his credibility with me with this article. I know that journalists try to twist things to make them sound way more exciting that they actually are but this article proves that there's a fine line between doing that and practically making things up. This was not cool, Saleh.
Balqis
· 3 months ago
I think is mainly a matter of writing style He applies the same scheme to his articles whether is finance, columns or social issues as if he's telling a tale and that gives different results depending on the subject he is discussing Plus of course he needs something to make the article more appealing but that's a trick each journalist uses
All Comments
It's a very badly written article
He's more fit for the columns on the Observer, politics is not his bread
He applies the same scheme to his articles whether is finance, columns or social issues as if he's telling a tale and that gives different results depending on the subject he is discussing
Plus of course he needs something to make the article more appealing but that's a trick each journalist uses
Bathmate